Troppo ardua la prova (diretta) dell’adulterio? La parola sull’art. 2351 n. 3 cod. civ. passa alla Corte costituzionale

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Is the (direct) proof of adultery too difficult? The word on art. 2351 n. 3 cod. civ. go to the Constitutional Court

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The note comments on the order of the Cassation of 5 June 2004, n. 10742, with which the qlc of the art. 235, paragraph 1, no. 3, cod. civ., in the part in which he admits the husband to prove that the child has genetic and hematological characteristics incompatible with those of the presumed father only after it has been furnished, from the latter, proof that during the conception period the wife has committed adultery .
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Is the (direct) proof of adultery too difficult? The word on art. 2351 n. 3 cod. civ. go to the Constitutional Court
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)489-497
Number of pages9
JournalDIRITTO DI FAMIGLIA E DELLE PERSONE
VolumeXXXIV
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • diritto della famiglia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Is the (direct) proof of adultery too difficult? The word on art. 2351 n. 3 cod. civ. go to the Constitutional Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this