[Autom. eng. transl.] The note comments on the order of the Cassation of 5 June 2004, n. 10742, with which the qlc of the art. 235, paragraph 1, no. 3, cod. civ., in the part in which he admits the husband to prove that the child has genetic and hematological characteristics incompatible with those of the presumed father only after it has been furnished, from the latter, proof that during the conception period the wife has committed adultery .
|Translated title of the contribution||[Autom. eng. transl.] Is the (direct) proof of adultery too difficult? The word on art. 2351 n. 3 cod. civ. go to the Constitutional Court|
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||DIRITTO DI FAMIGLIA E DELLE PERSONE|
|Publication status||Published - 2005|
- diritto della famiglia