Tre Tribunali italiani, la Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo e il diritto del concepito all’unitarietà delle figure genitoriali. In attesa della decisione della Corte costituzionale sul divieto di fecondazione eterologa

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Three Italian Courts, the European Court of Human Rights and the right of conceived to the unity of parental figures. Pending the decision of the Constitutional Court on the ban on heterologous fertilization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The article critically examines the content of three legal decisions (Courts of Florence, Catania and Milan) which ask the Constitutional Court to invalidate the prohibition of heterologous artificial fertilization in the Italian law on medically assisted procreation (Law n. 40 from 2004). The controversial ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of S.H. vs. Austria decided April 1, 2010 is also examined in passing as it influenced the decisions of the Italian judges. After interventions with the intention of introducing pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, now the attempt is to introduce a planned and agreed upon dissociation of parenthood. The rights of the conceived child are thus facing a new, difficult trial.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Three Italian Courts, the European Court of Human Rights and the right of conceived to the unity of parental figures. Pending the decision of the Constitutional Court on the ban on heterologous fertilization
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)13-41
Number of pages29
JournalMedicina e Morale
Volume61
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • biodiritto
  • fecondazione eterologa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Three Italian Courts, the European Court of Human Rights and the right of conceived to the unity of parental figures. Pending the decision of the Constitutional Court on the ban on heterologous fertilization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this