TRANSLATIO IUDICII E NUOVI RAPPORTI TRA GIUDICI ED ARBITRI

Antonino Barletta

TRANSLATIO IUDICII E NUOVI RAPPORTI TRA GIUDICI ED ARBITRI

Translated title of the contribution: TRANSLATIO IUDICII AND NEW RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN JUDGES AND REFEREES

Antonino Barletta

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The essay analyses the impact of the decision by the Constitutional Court\r\nno. 223 of the 2013, which declared unconstitutional Article 819-ter of the Italian\r\nCivil Procedure Code, according to which the ordinary rules regarding the\r\ncontinuation of the proceedings are not applicable when judges or arbitrators\r\ndeem themselves incompetent with respect to an arbitration agreement. In particular,\r\nthe focus is on the effect of the mentioned decision on the application\r\nof the competence-competence principle with respect to the main issues concerning\r\nthe coordination between judicial proceedings and arbitration.

Translated title of the contribution	TRANSLATIO IUDICII AND NEW RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN JUDGES AND REFEREES
Original language	Italian
Pages (from-to)	61-97
Number of pages	37
Journal	IL GIUSTO PROCESSO CIVILE
Volume	2015
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 2015

Keywords

arbitration
arbitration agreement
arbitrato
competence-competence principle
competenza
eccezione di compromesso
relationship between judicial proceedings and arbitration
translatio iudicii

Cite this

@article{4d2cc1a8e78c4a7c8261b416daf54590,

title = "TRANSLATIO IUDICII E NUOVI RAPPORTI TRA GIUDICI ED ARBITRI",

abstract = "The essay analyses the impact of the decision by the Constitutional Court\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}nno. 223 of the 2013, which declared unconstitutional Article 819-ter of the Italian\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}nCivil Procedure Code, according to which the ordinary rules regarding the\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}ncontinuation of the proceedings are not applicable when judges or arbitrators\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}ndeem themselves incompetent with respect to an arbitration agreement. In particular,\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}nthe focus is on the effect of the mentioned decision on the application\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}nof the competence-competence principle with respect to the main issues concerning\textbackslash{}r\textbackslash{}nthe coordination between judicial proceedings and arbitration.",

keywords = "arbitration, arbitration agreement, arbitrato, competence-competence principle, competenza, eccezione di compromesso, relationship between judicial proceedings and arbitration, translatio iudicii, arbitration, arbitration agreement, arbitrato, competence-competence principle, competenza, eccezione di compromesso, relationship between judicial proceedings and arbitration, translatio iudicii",

author = "Antonino Barletta",

year = "2015",

language = "Italian",

volume = "2015",

pages = "61--97",

journal = "IL GIUSTO PROCESSO CIVILE",

issn = "1828-311X",

publisher = "Napoli : Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TRANSLATIO IUDICII E NUOVI RAPPORTI TRA GIUDICI ED ARBITRI

AU - Barletta, Antonino

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The essay analyses the impact of the decision by the Constitutional Court\r\nno. 223 of the 2013, which declared unconstitutional Article 819-ter of the Italian\r\nCivil Procedure Code, according to which the ordinary rules regarding the\r\ncontinuation of the proceedings are not applicable when judges or arbitrators\r\ndeem themselves incompetent with respect to an arbitration agreement. In particular,\r\nthe focus is on the effect of the mentioned decision on the application\r\nof the competence-competence principle with respect to the main issues concerning\r\nthe coordination between judicial proceedings and arbitration.

AB - The essay analyses the impact of the decision by the Constitutional Court\r\nno. 223 of the 2013, which declared unconstitutional Article 819-ter of the Italian\r\nCivil Procedure Code, according to which the ordinary rules regarding the\r\ncontinuation of the proceedings are not applicable when judges or arbitrators\r\ndeem themselves incompetent with respect to an arbitration agreement. In particular,\r\nthe focus is on the effect of the mentioned decision on the application\r\nof the competence-competence principle with respect to the main issues concerning\r\nthe coordination between judicial proceedings and arbitration.

KW - arbitration

KW - arbitration agreement

KW - arbitrato

KW - competence-competence principle

KW - competenza

KW - eccezione di compromesso

KW - relationship between judicial proceedings and arbitration

KW - translatio iudicii

KW - arbitration

KW - arbitration agreement

KW - arbitrato

KW - competence-competence principle

KW - competenza

KW - eccezione di compromesso

KW - relationship between judicial proceedings and arbitration

KW - translatio iudicii

UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/66875

M3 - Articolo

SN - 1828-311X

VL - 2015

SP - 61

EP - 97

JO - IL GIUSTO PROCESSO CIVILE

JF - IL GIUSTO PROCESSO CIVILE

IS - 1

ER -

TRANSLATIO IUDICII E NUOVI RAPPORTI TRA GIUDICI ED ARBITRI

Abstract

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this