Torto e tipo

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Wrong and kind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Typicality’ recalls a technique of position of the case (fattispecie). The techniques of position consist in patterns of signification, by which men generate concepts. Position is always the origin of a concept. The Author explores this issue through two elective laboratories in the system of the Civil Code: the problem of the typicality of the sources of obligation; the problem of the typicality of tort. The Author tackles the matter from the perspective of language. In this way, he defines as “tort” (or – if one wishes – breach of a duty to protect) any type of conduct capable of harming an interest which is external from the relationship and therefore of causing negative damage; “default”, any type of conduct capable of harming an interest internal to the relationship (strong ‘utilitas’, guaranteed to the creditor) and of causing positive damage
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Wrong and kind
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)447-482
Number of pages36
JournalJUS
Volume2020
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Semantics
  • Tort

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Wrong and kind'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this