Abstract
Citizens, scientists, and institutions
should not miss the opportunity to cultivate the awareness toward a sound
epistemology of uncertainty. Since the beginning of the COVID crisis
there has been a shift in public discussion and the media from thinking that
we should listen to scientists and do what they suggest – according to the
science policy model of “science speaks truth to power” – to the disappointed
discovery that scientific uncertainty exists and scientific disagreements can be
radical, with the consequence that decision makers can ‘cherry pick’ results to
do what they want.
Scientific uncertainty does not mean arbitrariness and does not allow arbitrary
political decisions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 339-340 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Epidemiologia e prevenzione |
Volume | 44 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- citizens' rights
- pandemic
- science policy
- scientific uncertainty