Abstract
It is widely believed in the corporate governance literature that deviating from the `one share-one vote' principle leads to corporate inefficiencies. We analyze the market reaction to a change from the `one head-one vote' to the `one share-one vote' mechanism by means of a quasi-natural experiment: an Italian reform forcing a subset of cooperative banks to transform into joint-stock companies. We estimate the market valuation of the effects of the governance change around the event date being equal to a cumulative average return of about 14% using an event study methodology, and of about 13% using bayesian techniques.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 861-882 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Managerial Finance |
Volume | 46 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Bank Regulation
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Voting
- Voting Premium