The transatlantic productivity gap: Is R&D the main culprit?

Mariacristina Piva, Marco Vivarelli, Raquel Ortega-Argilés

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature has pointed to different causes to explain the productivity gap between Europe and United States in the last decades. This paper tests the hypothesis that the lower European productivity performance in comparison with the US can be explained not only by a lower level of corporate R&D investment, but also by a lower capacity to translate R&D investment into productivity gains. The proposed microeconometric estimates are based on a unique longitudinal database covering the period 1990-2008 and comprising 1,809 US and European companies for a total of 16,079 observations. Consistent with previous literature, we find robust evidence of a significant impact of R&D on productivity; however – using different estimation techniques - the R&D coefficients for the US firms always turn out to be significantly higher. To see to what extent these transatlantic differences may be related to the different sectoral structures in the US and the EU, we differentiated the analysis by sectors. The result is that both in manufacturing, services and high-tech manufacturing sectors US firms are more able to translate their R&D investments into productivity increases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1342-1371
Number of pages30
JournalCanadian Journal of Economics
Volume47
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • EU
  • Embodied technological change
  • Productivity
  • R&D
  • US

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The transatlantic productivity gap: Is R&D the main culprit?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this