Abstract
From a theoretical standpoint, this article examines Mouffe's political project of left populism based on Ernesto Laclau's theory. It first shows how the distinctiveness of left populism lies in its ability to radicalise democracy. However, the theory of the populist logic developed by Laclau and faithfully adopted by Mouffe tends to impose a series of negative implications on the idea of radicalising democracy originally formulated by the two scholars in the 1980s. The elements of originality are abandoned in favour of a "onedimensional flattening" of the political. As a result, the very "left" element that should, for Mouffe, be the defining feature of left populism ends up being severely weakened.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 353-363 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | RES PUBLICA |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy
Keywords
- Populism
- Left Populism
- Democracy
- Laclau
- Mouffe
- Populismo
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The (Too) Small Prince of Left Populism: Rereading Laclau and Mouffe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver