Abstract
The standard of the patient’s best interests is the main bioethical standard used in the decision-making process that involves incompetent patients (i.e. neonatology, pediatric patients and incompetent adults). This standard has been widely criticized as being self-destructive, individualistic, vague, unknown, dangerous and open to abuse. With the purpose of defending it, several reforms of this standard have been proposed, especially in the pediatric field. We propose a redefinition of the standard based on two concepts: 1) medical futility as a negative criterion, and 2) the principle of proportionality as a positive criterion. Our work includes a new relationship between concepts in classical moral theology (i.e. ordinary / extraordinary; proportionate / disproportionate) applied to the bioethics of life-sustaining treatments for incompetent patients.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 19-42 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Cuadernos de Bioetica |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 101 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Medicine
Keywords
- The best interests standard
- extraordinary
- futility
- life-sustaining treatments.
- ordinary
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The therapeutic proportionality standard: a new content for the best interests standard.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver