The Rules for Knowing the Human Being: Baumgarten’s Presence in Kant’s Anthropology

[Autom. eng. transl.] The goal of the present essay is to underscore that Kant's anthropological reflection does not acquire its most accomplished value when it is stressfully placed in the architectural project of the critique, but rather when we question the critical reflection. This possibility becomes almost a necessity in the Critique of the Power of Judgment. Here, by virtue of reflecting judgment, Kant illustrates the agreement between reason, as a universal horizon of judgment, and the singularity of the subject, which conveys any judgment. In doing so, Kant deals with subjectivity according to a perspective that is significantly influenced by Baumgarten's conception of the I, insofar as it differs from Wolff's positions. Thus, in the first section of this paper, we will outline the extent to which Baumgarten's treatment of relationship between empirical and rational psychology marks a departure from the Wolffian one. In the second part, we will show how Baumgarten's perspective influences Kant in the 1770s by analyzing Kant's lectures on metaphysics and anthropology, the basis of which is represented precisely by Baumgarten's Metaphysica. Then, we will focus on the most original of Kant's anthropological reflection, we will propose some remarks, aiming at assessing the extent of Baumgarten's presence in Kant's anthropological framework.