TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of robotic aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer: surgical and oncological outcome in a single institution experience
AU - Gallotta, Valerio
AU - Federico, Alex
AU - Gaballa, Khaled
AU - D'Indinosante, Marco
AU - Conte, Carmine
AU - Giudice, Maria Teresa
AU - Naldini, Angelica
AU - Lodoli, Claudio
AU - Rotolo, Stefano
AU - Gallucci, Valeria
AU - Tortorella, Lucia
AU - Scambia, Giovanni
AU - Ferrandina, Maria Gabriella
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background and Objective: This study aims to investigate the surgical outcomes observed in robotic transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy (AL) in gynecological cancer patients. Methods: Retrospective data were collected and analyzed on 71 patients undergoing robotic surgical procedures for gynecological cancers, including transperitoneal AL, between December 2014 and February 2018 at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. Results: Median age of the sample population was 50 years (range, 26-76 years). The median operative time was 210 minutes (range, 75-480 minutes), the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (range, 20-300 ml). The number of para-aortic nodes removed was 12 (range, 7-43). In the whole series, 13 patients (18.3%) had at least one metastatic node. Overall, 10 patients (14.1%) experienced any grade early postoperative complications. Three patients experienced more than one complication. Three intraoperative complications occurred with two cases of vascular injury. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for one patient (1.4%). Conclusions: The present study shows the safety and adequacy of robotic transperitoneal AL as surgical staging step for gynecological cancers in terms of perioperative and postoperative outcomes.
AB - Background and Objective: This study aims to investigate the surgical outcomes observed in robotic transperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy (AL) in gynecological cancer patients. Methods: Retrospective data were collected and analyzed on 71 patients undergoing robotic surgical procedures for gynecological cancers, including transperitoneal AL, between December 2014 and February 2018 at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. Results: Median age of the sample population was 50 years (range, 26-76 years). The median operative time was 210 minutes (range, 75-480 minutes), the median estimated blood loss was 50 ml (range, 20-300 ml). The number of para-aortic nodes removed was 12 (range, 7-43). In the whole series, 13 patients (18.3%) had at least one metastatic node. Overall, 10 patients (14.1%) experienced any grade early postoperative complications. Three patients experienced more than one complication. Three intraoperative complications occurred with two cases of vascular injury. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary for one patient (1.4%). Conclusions: The present study shows the safety and adequacy of robotic transperitoneal AL as surgical staging step for gynecological cancers in terms of perioperative and postoperative outcomes.
KW - gynecological cancers
KW - innovative technologies in surgery
KW - minimally invasive surgery
KW - personalized medicine
KW - robotic surgery
KW - gynecological cancers
KW - innovative technologies in surgery
KW - minimally invasive surgery
KW - personalized medicine
KW - robotic surgery
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/128447
UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(issn)1096-9098
U2 - 10.1002/jso.25335
DO - 10.1002/jso.25335
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-4790
VL - 119
SP - 355
EP - 360
JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology
JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology
ER -