Abstract
This paper investigates how three design-intensive furnishings manufacturers managed, over an about 30 years time span, the structure of their networks of dyadic, joint-design collaborative relations with consulting industrial design firms. To answer the research question of the study, I initially advance a proposal for the operazionalization of tie strength, which is consistent with Granovetter¿s (1973) original proposal. Then, the strengths of strong ties and the weaknesses of a strong ties network are highlighted. Finally, I discuss the ability to create and preserve over time a ¿dual¿ network as a distinctive relational capability of the ¿central firm¿. I argue that managing an interfirm network so as to integrate a periphery of diverse, weak ties into a network architecture based on a core of strong ties, can provide a fertile ground for the central firm to gain a competitive advantage, whose sustainability is primarily based on the resulting, dynamic innovative capability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2001 Academy of Management (AOM) Conference |
| Pages | 1-31 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
| Event | 2001 Academy of Management (AOM) Conference - Washington Duration: 5 Aug 2001 → 8 Aug 2001 |
Conference
| Conference | 2001 Academy of Management (AOM) Conference |
|---|---|
| City | Washington |
| Period | 5/8/01 → 8/8/01 |
Keywords
- innovation
- interfirm networks
- network structure
- organizational capabilities
- relational capabilities
- strength of ties
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Evidence from three longitudinal case studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver