The Conjoint Rorschach Comprehensive System: Reliability and validity in clinical and non–clinical couples

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents the comparison of 2 paired groups of satisfied (n = 22) and distressed (n = 22) couples using a conjoint version of the Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS; Exner, 2003). The aim of the study was to evaluate if the couples’ verbalizations could be coded reliably using standard CS variables and if the 2 groups of protocols differed on several dimensions hypothesized to reflect relational dissatisfaction. The results showed good to excellent interrater reliability for the selected CS variables. Comparisons revealed expected moderate to large differences between the satisfied and distressed groups with regard to communication (R), some of the affective variables (DEPI%, Afr, SumV%, Col-Shading Blends%), and cognitive variables (X–%, WDA% Sum6%, WSum6%). Among variables connected with aggression, only AgPast% was moderately higher in the distressed group of couples. Overall, the results support the use of the Conjoint Rorschach Comprehensive System (ConRCS) in couples’ assessments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-53
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Conjoint Rorschach Comprehensive System
  • Rorschach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Conjoint Rorschach Comprehensive System: Reliability and validity in clinical and non–clinical couples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this