Abstract
The tensions surrounding the regulation of adjudicatory jurisdiction, including as regards the admissibility of, and the conditions for, the exercise of universal civil jurisdiction, are premised on the understanding that jurisdiction, as a legal notion, is concerned essentially with power. The practice of States, however, is evolving. Jurisdiction can no longer be described as being solely about power, nor chiefly about States. A different conception of jurisdiction is emerging which involves responsibility alongside power, and is concerned with the efficiency, not just the legitimacy, of States’ action. The contention is made that a renewed understanding of jurisdiction, one acknowledging the role that cooperation and dialogue between courts play in the management of cross-border disputes, would help shape workable responses to the challenges posed by the recourse to civil litigation in connection with international wrongs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Universal Civil Jurisdiction - Which Way Forward? |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Pages | 170-187 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789004408562 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- Competenza giurisdizionale
- Cooperazione internazionale
- International cooperation
- Jurisdiction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Changing Face of Adjudicatory Jurisdiction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver