Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The alphas and omegas of validity and reliability: Contemporary advances in evaluating and selecting instruments for quantitative research with emerging adults.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The current chapter presents a non-technical description of the most important features of the current conceptualization of validity and reliability and the best practices to evaluate them. The chapter is organized into two sections. The first section introduces the contemporary view of validity, which stresses that validity is unified (the core of validity is construct validity, which can be argued for by collecting different kinds of evidence) and contextualized (validity always depends on the population, place, and time in which the test is applied). Implications in terms of validation practices are presented. The second section explains why the widely used coefficient alpha may be an inadequate index of reliability and suggests substituting it with coefficient omega. Guidelines in both sections of the chapter are demonstrated using the procedures adopted to develop and validate the Multidimensional Subjective Financial Well-being Scale in a sample of Italian emerging adults.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFlourishing as a Scholar: Research Methods for the Study of Emerging Adulthood
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages92-112
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)9780197677797
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Psychology

Keywords

  • coefficient alpha
  • coefficient omega
  • contemporary view of validity
  • internal consistency
  • reliability
  • unified view of validity
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The alphas and omegas of validity and reliability: Contemporary advances in evaluating and selecting instruments for quantitative research with emerging adults.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this