Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution analyzes the ruling of the Constitutional Court which rejects as unfounded the complaints of
illegitimacy relating to articles 13, paragraph 13, of the d.l. 31.12.2020, n. 183, as converted, and 40-quater of
d.l. 22.12.2021, n. 4, as converted. The sentence considers the norms to be in conformity with the constitutional precepts
emergencies regarding the so-called blocking of evictions, since the relative scope of application has been gradually
restricted and in any case temporally limited, contrary to what happened in relation to the suspension of property expropriation procedures concerning the debtor's main residence.
The Council also excludes the possibility of introducing new extensions after 31.12.2021. The
written will allow 'to carry out some critical comments to the decision of the Constitutional Court, especially
in light of the principles underlying the previous sentence no. 218 of 2021.
Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] '' Temporarily '' legitimizes the suspension of the issuing procedures. |
---|---|
Original language | Italian |
Pages (from-to) | 296-309 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | LA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA |
Volume | 2022 |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
Keywords
- Inglese