Abstract
Background: Two-to 6-year results of reconstruction of severe bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with highly porous tantalum cones have been encouraging, but 10-year follow-up is lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum 10-year results of tantalum cones in revision TKA. Methods: From 2005 to 2010, 30 consecutive patients (30 knees) underwent revision TKA with the use of cones. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 10 years. A total of 42 cones (25 tibial and 17 femoral) were used to reconstruct massive bone defects classified as Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Types 2A (10), 2B (12), and 3 (19). The mean age of the patients was 73 years (range, 55 to 84) at the time of revision. The indication for the revision included aseptic loosening (15 patients) and second-stage reimplantation for deep infection (15 patients). Six patients were lost to follow-up. Results: In total, 6 cones had to be revised. Minimum 10-year cone survivorship for any reason was 81% (25 of 31 cones). With cone revision for aseptic loosening as the end point, survivorship was 96% (30 of 31). No evidence of loosening or migration of any implant was noted on the most recent radiographs. Conclusion: Metaphyseal fixation with tantalum cones in revision TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship and fixation at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. This type of metaphyseal reconstruction can be a durable option for revision TKA in patients who have massive bone defects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 886-892 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY |
| Volume | 38 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- bone defects
- metaphyseal bone loss
- tantalum cones
- porous metal
- revision total knee arthroplasty
- metaphyseal fixation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver