Abstract
This writing is aimed to explain the expression matters relating to contract and matters relating to tort delict or quasi-delict as used in the Bruxelles and Lugano Convention on jurisdiction, especially focusing on the interpretation given by the ECJ. The Luxembourg Court has always intended the relation to contract literally, i.e. as implying in any case a contract as the source of obligation from which the litigation arises. On the contrary, it must be taken into account that contractual is a qualification that in civil law countries refers to obligation whatever is its source. At the same time, to limit contractual qualification to the obligations generated by a contract implies that liability deriving from violation of any other obligation leads only to an action in tort. This result is contradictory in that a liability deriving from a legal relationship ends up by taking its qualification as a tort, while this one is the category relating to damage caused outside any previous legal relationship.
| Translated title of the contribution | On the meaning of contractual matters and matters of civil torts in European sources relating to jurisdiction |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 517-543 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | EUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- civil liability
- competenza giurisdizionale
- contract
- contratto
- jurisdiction
- obbligazione
- obligation
- responsabilità civile
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the meaning of contractual matters and matters of civil torts in European sources relating to jurisdiction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver