TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder Engagement beyond the Tension between Idealism and Practical Concerns
AU - Biraghi, Silvia
AU - Gambetti, Rossella Chiara
AU - Romenti, S.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This paper digs into the existing controversial literature on stakeholder engagement (SE) to understand and
critically confront with ambivalence in the concept. This is done by exploring how SE is conceptually framed and
pragmatically pursued in the representations of current business practices. The study is designed according to a
qualitative interpretive approach based on depth interviews with a purposively selected theoretical sample of key
informants with established expertise in stakeholder relationship management practices. According to our findings,
SE appears torn between an idealistic impetus on the fringe of a utopian vision of the business, and its often trivial
translation into practice urged by the pragmatic necessity to meet accountability requirements. This tension stems
from corporate governance logics and organizational business models of firms, which are often not prone to
guarantee the participatory and genuinely dialogic exchange between company and stakeholders advocated by the
idealistic mandate of SE. In terms of contribution the paper provides a critical inductive reconstruction of current
meanings and clashes embedded in enacting SE.
AB - This paper digs into the existing controversial literature on stakeholder engagement (SE) to understand and
critically confront with ambivalence in the concept. This is done by exploring how SE is conceptually framed and
pragmatically pursued in the representations of current business practices. The study is designed according to a
qualitative interpretive approach based on depth interviews with a purposively selected theoretical sample of key
informants with established expertise in stakeholder relationship management practices. According to our findings,
SE appears torn between an idealistic impetus on the fringe of a utopian vision of the business, and its often trivial
translation into practice urged by the pragmatic necessity to meet accountability requirements. This tension stems
from corporate governance logics and organizational business models of firms, which are often not prone to
guarantee the participatory and genuinely dialogic exchange between company and stakeholders advocated by the
idealistic mandate of SE. In terms of contribution the paper provides a critical inductive reconstruction of current
meanings and clashes embedded in enacting SE.
KW - business-society relations
KW - moral engagement
KW - stakeholder dialogue
KW - stakeholder engagement
KW - strategic engagement
KW - business-society relations
KW - moral engagement
KW - stakeholder dialogue
KW - stakeholder engagement
KW - strategic engagement
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/99475
U2 - 10.5539/ijbm.v12n2p14
DO - 10.5539/ijbm.v12n2p14
M3 - Article
SN - 1833-8119
SP - 14
EP - 26
JO - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
JF - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT
ER -