Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Social reuse of confiscated assets in the EU: current experiences and potential for its adoption by other EU and non-EU countries

  • Barbara Vettori*
  • , Boban Misoski
  • *Corresponding author

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

An effective and efficient disposal of assets confiscated from criminals is crucial to ensure that confiscation policies reach their expected objectives. If any problems arise in the last phase of confiscation proceedings, the efforts made by the criminal justice system in tracing, seizing and confiscating criminal assets can be brought to nought. Notwithstanding its importance, only limited attention has been given to the topic. Recently, EU institutions have shown an increasing interest toward a peculiar form of disposal, which involves giving criminal proceeds back to the communities affected by crime and promoting their use in line with communal needs: social reuse. So, for example, Directive 2014/42/EU invites Member States to ‘consider taking measures allowing confiscated property to be used for public interest or social purposes’. This article responds to these questions: which Member States envisage the social reuse of confiscated assets? Could other Member States adopt it and, if so, under which conditions? And what about acceding countries, using the Republic of Macedonia as a case study?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLIBER AMICORUM. Studia in honorem academici Vlado Kambovski septuagesimo anno (MCMXXXIX-MMXIX)
EditorsT Fiti, G Koevski
Pages721-738
Number of pages18
Publication statusPublished - 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • EU Member States
  • Republic of Macedonia
  • disposal of confiscated assets
  • social reuse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social reuse of confiscated assets in the EU: current experiences and potential for its adoption by other EU and non-EU countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this