Singolarità di oggetto del processo penale e prescrizione à la carte

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Singularity subject of the criminal trial and prescription à la carte

Giulio Ubertis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] Since the statute of limitations has been changed, the judge must apply the most favorable (between the old and the new) to the accused of two crimes judged in the same process and, with the decision subjected to criticism, makes a single choice. Consequently, he acquits the accused for only one of them. Thus it violates the principle according to which each trial concerns only one defendant for a single charge (even in the case of joint treatment for multiple crimes), as well as art. 3, 25 and 111 of the Constitution, allowing the public prosecutor to determine the application or not of the prescription, depending on how he decides to act (separately or jointly).
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Singularity subject of the criminal trial and prescription à la carte
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)77-79
Number of pages3
JournalPROCESSO PENALE E GIUSTIZIA
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Criminal proceedings
  • Prescrizione penale
  • Processo penale
  • Statute of limitations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Singularity subject of the criminal trial and prescription à la carte'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this