Abstract
The 2 broad approaches to preoperative therapy for rectal cancer are chemoradiation and short-course radiation. The outcomes of these 2 approaches reported in nonrandomized trials are not comparable because patients selected for treatment with short-course radiotherapy included those with cT1-3 disease, whereas patients selected for chemoradiation included those with T3 and/or N+ disease. However, more recent trials of short-course radiation have included patients with cT3 and/or N+ disease who also underwent sequential or postoperative chemotherapy, allowing a more relevant comparison with chemoradiation. This article compares the 2 preoperative approaches and addresses their emerging roles.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1223-1231 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK |
| Volume | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Carcinoma
- Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Choice Behavior
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Digestive System Surgical Procedures
- Humans
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Time Factors
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Short-course radiation versus long-course chemoradiation for rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver