Scompare definitivamente la distinzione tra leggi costituzionalmente necessarie e leggi a contenuto costituzionalmente vincolato? Uno sguardo d'insieme alle sentenze sui referendum del 2005

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Does the distinction between constitutionally necessary laws and laws with a constitutionally bound content disappear definitively? An overview of the rulings on the 2005 referendums

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The distinction between the two categories of laws indicated in the title constitutes one of the most problematic nodes of the constitutional jurisprudence concerning the admissibility of referendum questions. The article aims to analyze the state of the art on the problem and offers some critical and interpretative ideas of the referendum institute and its limits, drawing inspiration from the 2005 Constitutional Court's rulings
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Does the distinction between constitutionally necessary laws and laws with a constitutionally bound content disappear definitively? An overview of the rulings on the 2005 referendums
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalAMMINISTRAZIONE IN CAMMINO
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Keywords

  • Corte costituzionale
  • Referendum

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Does the distinction between constitutionally necessary laws and laws with a constitutionally bound content disappear definitively? An overview of the rulings on the 2005 referendums'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this