Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] For the Court, the GO's jurisdiction over the Bank of Italy's sanctioning measures extends to the prerequisites, also of a regulatory nature, governing the sanctioning procedure. In short, the union on the sanctioning legal relationship necessarily also passes through the union on the sanctioning procedure and its right. It is precisely the unity of the sanctioning relationship, however, which lays bare the complexity of administrative action, as well as the inconsistencies inherent in the separation, on a theoretical rather than a regulatory level, between the supervisory function and the credit sanction (and not only). These inconsistencies therefore remain against the background of a non-resolutive regulatory framework, leaving the ground open to new disputes, between legislator and judge.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Sanctions of the Bank of Italy and jurisdiction of the GO: an (in) finished story? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | GIURISPRUDENZA ITALIANA |
| Volume | 2020/4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Keywords
- Banche
- Sanzioni amministrative
- administrative sanctions
- banking sector
- giurisdizione
- jurisdiction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Sanctions of the Bank of Italy and jurisdiction of the GO: an (in) finished story?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver