Abstract
The essay deals with the compensation problems that arise when the same harmful fact is imputed to a plurality of persons. In particular, it investigates the nature and operational area of the rule of compensatory solidarity declined by Article 2055 of the Italian Civil Code. In this context, the different opinions expressed in this regard in the literature are highlighted, also through appropriate references to foreign legal systems. Furthermore, the essay examines (with some critical remarks) the orientation of the case law, generally in favour of a broad application of compensatory solidarity in any hypothesis of multiple contributions to the same damage, even if such contributions are completely autonomous from each other, as well as of different nature and consistency.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Reflections on multi-subject obligations: a «return» to the reasons for the bond of solidarity |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 813-835 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | RIVISTA DI DIRITTO CIVILE |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Obbligazioni plurisogettive
- Solidarietà
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Reflections on multi-subject obligations: a «return» to the reasons for the bond of solidarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver