Abstract
Botox(®) and Dysport(®) are the preparations of botulinum neurotoxin most widely used for therapeutic purposes. Several studies have addressed the topic of the equivalency ratio (D/B ratio) to be used in clinical practice and whether a reliable value exists is still a matter of debate. To this purpose, we ideated a novel paradigm by retrospectively examining the patients affected by hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. We compared the pairs of treatments with a switch from one brand to the other undergone by the same patient in consecutive sessions with overlapping clinical outcome. Out of 2006 treatments, we found 51 treatment pairs. D/B ratio was extremely variable (range 1.2-13.3) and in most cases (65%) it was between 1:3 and 1:5. In conclusion, even if the 1:4 ratio might be reliable for clinical purpose, a true bioequivalence between Dysport(®) and Botox(®) might not exist due to the intrinsic difference in their pharmacokinetic properties.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 261-267 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Neurological Sciences |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Blepharospasm
- Botulinum toxin
- Dose equivalence ratio
- Hemifacial spasm
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective evaluation of the dose equivalence of Botox and Dysport in the management of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm: a novel paradigm for a never ending story'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver