Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] For shareholdings held under the administered savings regime, it is doubtful whether the taxpayer can make the contribution in fiscal neutrality pursuant to art. 177, c. 2 and 2-bis of the TUIR.
In fact, there is an anti-avoidance rule (art. 6, c. 6, of Legislative Decree 461/1997) which equates every transfer of instruments under the administered savings regime from a securities dossier to another securities dossier, registered to a different person, to a transfer for consideration, realizing the related capital gains.
In the absence of official clarifications from the Revenue Agency and jurisprudential pronouncements, this article summarizes the reasons why the anti-avoidance provision should not be applied, especially for contributions aimed at reorganizing the corporate structure for the implementation of the transition generational.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Administered savings regime, neutral contributions under art. are in doubt. 177, paragraph 2 and 2-bis, TUIR |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 55-65 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | MODULO24 WEALTH PLANNING |
| Volume | 2024 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Conferimenti
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Administered savings regime, neutral contributions under art. are in doubt. 177, paragraph 2 and 2-bis, TUIR'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver