Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship

Mara Gorli, Davide Nicolini, Giuseppe Scaratti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we build on the results of a participatory action research project in healthcare to discuss a number of methods that can strengthen the link between reflexive work and authoring in organizational contexts. We argue that, from an organizational point of view, the challenge is to devise new ways to configure (and consider) people as the authors of their work. This means assuming responsibility for, and constructively contributing to, the goals of the organizations to which they belong. Combining insights from theoretical reflection and experience from the field, the article discusses the tools, process and material conditions for fostering practical reflexivity and organizational authorship. We conclude that much is to be gained if we distinguish between authorship and authoring. Authorship is the general process whereby managers and organizational members contribute to the reproduction of organizational realities. Authoring is constituted by the special circumstances whereby authorship is brought to critical consciousness and becomes open to deliberate reorientation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1347-1375
Number of pages28
JournalHuman Relations
Volume2015/68
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • at-home ethnography
  • healthcare
  • organizational change
  • participatory action research
  • practical reflexivity
  • practice theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this