Recensione a Tommaso Pellegrini, Interesse alla prestazione e prevedeibilità del danno, Torino 2018

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Review to Tommaso Pellegrini, Interest in performance and predictability of damage, Turin 2018

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

Abstract

The review considers a recent monography dedicated to the foreseeability rule set up in art. 1225 of the Italian civil code, as a criterion to assess damages. The main question relates to the interplay and the priority between art. 1223 and 1225 in liquidating damages. While the author of the monography, from a historical point of view, attributes the pre-eminence to the foreseeability rule (art. 1225), the reviewer considers this perspective not consistent with the system resulting from the civil code, where the dominant rule is art. 1223, according to which damages must cover what is ‘immediate and direct consequence’ of non performance. Whereas the foreseeability rule, applies to further losses.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Review to Tommaso Pellegrini, Interest in performance and predictability of damage, Turin 2018
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)297-306
Number of pages10
JournalEUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • Conseguenze immediate e dirette
  • Damages
  • Prevedibilità
  • Risarcimento del danno
  • foreseeability rule
  • immediate and direct consequence
  • obligation
  • oggetto dell'obbligazione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Review to Tommaso Pellegrini, Interest in performance and predictability of damage, Turin 2018'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this