Recensione a Rivello P. P., La prova scientifica

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Review in Rivello PP, The scientific proof

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The introduction of scientific proof in the penal process raises several questions, starting from the difficulties of offering an "explanatory definition", to continue, for example, with the criteria by which to distinguish science properly understood by bad science or, again, with identification of the evidentiary instrument through which to acquire scientific knowledge
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Review in Rivello PP, The scientific proof
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)2198-2199
Number of pages2
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO E PROCEDURA PENALE
Volume2014
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Forensic evidence
  • expertise
  • perizia
  • prova scientifica
  • science e bad science
  • scienza e cattiva scienza

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Review in Rivello PP, The scientific proof'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this