Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reati sessuali e tutela dei minori: la prospettiva dei mezzi di informazione e quella dei giudici a confronto

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Sexual crimes and protection of minors: the perspective of the media and that of the judges in comparison
  • Marta Bertolino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] In the sentence that is noted, issued in a case of sexual acts committed on a minor by the cohabitant of the mother, the Supreme Court affirmed that the attenuating circumstance of the less serious cases referred to in art. 609 quater of the Italian Criminal Code applicable to the crime in question must be carefully evaluated, with reference to the incidence that the offending conduct actually had on the harmonious development of the victim's sexual sphere. By reconstructing the story and the ways in which it was disseminated through the media, the author highlights how the current mass-media practice in the representation of crime normally operates distortions, both qualitative and quantitative. The decision is also a useful opportunity to focus attention on the needs of the child's protection, often exposed to abusive behavior, which take on a marked gravity when they occur in the family.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Sexual crimes and protection of minors: the perspective of the media and that of the judges in comparison
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)340-356
Number of pages17
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO E PROCEDURA PENALE
Publication statusPublished - 2006

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Minore vittima
  • Reati contro la libertà sessuale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Sexual crimes and protection of minors: the perspective of the media and that of the judges in comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this