Abstract
Hitherto metaphysics has usually relied upon the same concept of reality that prevails within common sense and natural science, i.e. being a possible object of sensible experience: but according to the rules of logic such a concept is incompatible with the assertion and even the assumption of a supersensible reality. However, we have no reason to consent to it because it derives from an undue absolutization of the pragmatic criterion according to which my actual body is given a pre-eminence over my dreamed or imagined bodies and my real world is given a pre-eminence over all those Leibnizian possible worlds that some analytical philosophers rightly consider to be as real as our real world. In fact, a correct ontology must admit the ultimate identity of possibility and reality; as for the existence of God, it is to be proved a priori, on the model of St. Anselm’s argument, not a posteriori.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Reality, existence, possible worlds |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 259-266 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Acta Philosophica |
| Volume | XXXIII |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
Keywords
- A Priori Proof of the Existence of God
- Fictitious Entities
- Metaphysics
- Possible Worlds
- Transcendence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Reality, existence, possible worlds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver