TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-evaluation of the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol A (BPA) in foodstuffs
AU - Lambré, Claude
AU - Barat Baviera, José Manuel
AU - Bolognesi, Claudia
AU - Chesson, Andrew
AU - Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro
AU - Crebelli, Riccardo
AU - Gott, David Michael
AU - Grob, Konrad
AU - Lampi, Evgenia
AU - Mengelers, Marcel
AU - Mortensen, Alicja
AU - Rivière, Gilles
AU - Silano, Vittorio
AU - Steffensen, Inger-Lise
AU - Tlustos, Christina
AU - Vernis, Laurence
AU - Zorn, Holger
AU - Batke, Monika
AU - Bignami, Margherita
AU - Corsini, Emanuela
AU - Fitzgerald, Rex
AU - Gundert-Remy, Ursula
AU - Halldorsson, Thorhallur
AU - Hart, Andrew
AU - Ntzani, Evangelia
AU - Scanziani, Eugenio
AU - Schroeder, Henri
AU - Ulbrich, Beate
AU - Waalkens-Berendsen, Dina
AU - Woelfle, Detlef
AU - Al Harraq, Zainab
AU - Baert, Katleen
AU - Carfì, Maria
AU - Castoldi, Anna F
AU - Croera, Cristina
AU - Van Loveren, Henk
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In 2015, EFSA established a temporary tolerable daily intake (t-TDI) for BPA of 4 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day. In 2016, the European Commission mandated EFSA to re-evaluate the risks to public health from the presence of BPA in foodstuffs and to establish a tolerable daily intake (TDI). For this re-evaluation, a pre-established protocol was used that had undergone public consultation. The CEP Panel concluded that it is Unlikely to Very Unlikely that BPA presents a genotoxic hazard through a direct mechanism. Taking into consideration the evidence from animal data and support from human observational studies, the immune system was identified as most sensitive to BPA exposure. An effect on Th17 cells in mice was identified as the critical effect; these cells are pivotal in cellular immune mechanisms and involved in the development of inflammatory conditions, including autoimmunity and lung inflammation. A reference point (RP) of 8.2 ng/kg bw per day, expressed as human equivalent dose, was identified for the critical effect. Uncertainty analysis assessed a probability of 57–73% that the lowest estimated Benchmark Dose (BMD) for other health effects was below the RP based on Th17 cells. In view of this, the CEP Panel judged that an additional uncertainty factor (UF) of 2 was needed for establishing the TDI. Applying an overall UF of 50 to the RP, a TDI of 0.2 ng BPA/kg bw per day was established. Comparison of this TDI with the dietary exposure estimates from the 2015 EFSA opinion showed that both the mean and the 95th percentile dietary exposures in all age groups exceeded the TDI by two to three orders of magnitude. Even considering the uncertainty in the exposure assessment, the exceedance being so large, the CEP Panel concluded that there is a health concern from dietary BPA exposure.
AB - In 2015, EFSA established a temporary tolerable daily intake (t-TDI) for BPA of 4 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day. In 2016, the European Commission mandated EFSA to re-evaluate the risks to public health from the presence of BPA in foodstuffs and to establish a tolerable daily intake (TDI). For this re-evaluation, a pre-established protocol was used that had undergone public consultation. The CEP Panel concluded that it is Unlikely to Very Unlikely that BPA presents a genotoxic hazard through a direct mechanism. Taking into consideration the evidence from animal data and support from human observational studies, the immune system was identified as most sensitive to BPA exposure. An effect on Th17 cells in mice was identified as the critical effect; these cells are pivotal in cellular immune mechanisms and involved in the development of inflammatory conditions, including autoimmunity and lung inflammation. A reference point (RP) of 8.2 ng/kg bw per day, expressed as human equivalent dose, was identified for the critical effect. Uncertainty analysis assessed a probability of 57–73% that the lowest estimated Benchmark Dose (BMD) for other health effects was below the RP based on Th17 cells. In view of this, the CEP Panel judged that an additional uncertainty factor (UF) of 2 was needed for establishing the TDI. Applying an overall UF of 50 to the RP, a TDI of 0.2 ng BPA/kg bw per day was established. Comparison of this TDI with the dietary exposure estimates from the 2015 EFSA opinion showed that both the mean and the 95th percentile dietary exposures in all age groups exceeded the TDI by two to three orders of magnitude. Even considering the uncertainty in the exposure assessment, the exceedance being so large, the CEP Panel concluded that there is a health concern from dietary BPA exposure.
KW - Bisphenol A
KW - BPA
KW - food contact materials
KW - toxicity
KW - health risks
KW - TDI
KW - hazard
KW - Bisphenol A
KW - BPA
KW - food contact materials
KW - toxicity
KW - health risks
KW - TDI
KW - hazard
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/258721
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.6857
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.6857
M3 - Article
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 21
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
ER -