TY - JOUR
T1 - Rare variants associated with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Reclassification five years later
AU - Vallverdú-Prats, Marta
AU - Alcalde, Mireia
AU - Sarquella-Brugada, Georgia
AU - Cesar, Sergi
AU - Arbelo, Elena
AU - Fernandez-Falgueras, Anna
AU - Coll, Mónica
AU - Pérez-Serra, Alexandra
AU - Puigmulé, Marta
AU - Iglesias, Anna
AU - Fiol, Victoria
AU - Ferrer-Costa, Carles
AU - Olmo, Bernat Del
AU - Picó, Ferran
AU - Lopez, Laura
AU - Jordà, Paloma
AU - García-Álvarez, Ana
AU - Llano, Coloma Tirón De
AU - Toro, Rocío
AU - Grassi, Simone
AU - Oliva, Antonio
AU - Brugada, Josep
AU - Brugada, Ramon
AU - Campuzano, Oscar
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Genetic interpretation of rare variants associated with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is essential due to their diagnostic implications. New data may relabel previous variant classifications, but how often reanalysis is necessary remains undefined. Five years ago, 39 rare ACM-related variants were identified in patients with features of cardiomyopathy. These variants were classified following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics’ guidelines. In the present study, we reevaluated these rare variants including novel available data. All cases carried one rare variant classified as being of ambiguous significance (82.05%) or likely pathogenic (17.95%) in 2016. In our comprehensive reanalysis, the classification of 30.77% of these variants changed, mainly due to updated global frequencies. As in 2016, nowadays most variants were classified as having an uncertain role (64.1%), but the proportion of variants with an uncertain role was significantly decreased (17.95%). The percentage of rare variants classified as potentially del-eterious increased from 17.95% to 23.07%. Moreover, 83.33% of reclassified variants gained cer-tainty. We propose that periodic genetic reanalysis of all rare variants associated with arrhythmo-genic cardiomyopathy should be undertaken at least once every five years. Defining the roles of rare variants may help clinicians obtain a definite diagnosis.
AB - Genetic interpretation of rare variants associated with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is essential due to their diagnostic implications. New data may relabel previous variant classifications, but how often reanalysis is necessary remains undefined. Five years ago, 39 rare ACM-related variants were identified in patients with features of cardiomyopathy. These variants were classified following the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics’ guidelines. In the present study, we reevaluated these rare variants including novel available data. All cases carried one rare variant classified as being of ambiguous significance (82.05%) or likely pathogenic (17.95%) in 2016. In our comprehensive reanalysis, the classification of 30.77% of these variants changed, mainly due to updated global frequencies. As in 2016, nowadays most variants were classified as having an uncertain role (64.1%), but the proportion of variants with an uncertain role was significantly decreased (17.95%). The percentage of rare variants classified as potentially del-eterious increased from 17.95% to 23.07%. Moreover, 83.33% of reclassified variants gained cer-tainty. We propose that periodic genetic reanalysis of all rare variants associated with arrhythmo-genic cardiomyopathy should be undertaken at least once every five years. Defining the roles of rare variants may help clinicians obtain a definite diagnosis.
KW - Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
KW - Genetics
KW - Rare variants
KW - Reclas-sification
KW - Sudden cardiac death
KW - Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
KW - Genetics
KW - Rare variants
KW - Reclas-sification
KW - Sudden cardiac death
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/175466
U2 - 10.3390/jpm11030162
DO - 10.3390/jpm11030162
M3 - Article
SN - 2075-4426
VL - 2021
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Journal of Personalized Medicine
JF - Journal of Personalized Medicine
ER -