Abstract
Using data on the US and EU top R&D spenders from 2004 until 2012, this paper investigates the sources of the US/EU productivity gap. We find robust evidence that US firms have a higher capacity to translate R&D into productivity gains (especially in the high-tech macro sector), and this contributes to explaining the higher productivity of US firms. Conversely, EU firms are more likely to achieve productivity gains through capital-embodied technological change, at least in the medium- and low-tech macro sectors. Our results also show that the US/EU productivity gap has worsened during the crisis period, as the EU companies have been more affected by the economic crisis in their capacity to translate R&D investments into productivity. Based on these findings, we make a case for a learning-based and selective R&D funding, which, instead of purely aiming at stimulating higher R&D expenditures, works on improving the firms’ capabilities to transform R&D into productivity gains.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-291 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Technological Forecasting and Social Change |
| Volume | 138 |
| Issue number | 138 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Business and International Management
- Applied Psychology
- Management of Technology and Innovation
Keywords
- EU
- Economic crisis
- Productivity
- R&D
- US
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'R&D and productivity in the US and the EU: Sectoral specificities and differences in the crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver