Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Résections hépatiques pour lithiases sur dilatations congénitales des voies biliaires intrahépatiques

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Hepatic resections for lithiasis on congenital dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] OBJECTIVE: This study reports clinical experience with liver resections for congenital dilatation of the bile ducts and associated intrahepatic lithiasis to evaluate outcomes and define indications for treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied the clinical data of patients undergoing liver resection from January 1992 to December 2008 and assessed the immediate results at a distance from the interventions. Results.- Of 49 patients treated, 47 underwent liver resection. In the majority of cases the disease was limited to the left liver and left hepatectomy was the most common surgical procedure. Operative mortality was nil and morbidity 24.5%. A cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed in six cases (12.2%). In 91.6% of cases, the distance results were good or satisfactory. Conclusion.- The objectives of the treatment should be in all cases the elimination of stones, the prevention of recurrence as well as that of cholangiocarcinoma. The excisional surgery represents the best possible treatment for symptomatic patients with localized disease and atrophy of the affected liver.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Hepatic resections for lithiasis on congenital dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts
Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)226-232
Number of pages7
JournalJOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE VISCÉRALE
Volume147
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Intrahepatic lithiasis
  • Liver resection
  • Results

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Hepatic resections for lithiasis on congenital dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this