Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Questioni di legittimità costituzionale per contrasto con le sentenze della Corte EDU e ricorso per cassazione per motivi di giurisdizione contro le sentenze dei giudici speciali: la Corte costituzionale pone altri punti fermi.

Translated title of the contribution: Questions of constitutional legitimacy due to conflict with the judgments of the ECtHR and appeal by cassation for reasons of jurisdiction against the judgments of special judges: the Constitutional Court places other fixed points.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The Constitutional Court clarifies that a sentence of conviction of the EDU Court is not a sufficient condition to determine the illegitimacy of a national rule, even in the event that this rule has been subject to evaluation in the context of the judgment made before the EDU Court.
Translated title of the contributionQuestions of constitutional legitimacy due to conflict with the judgments of the ECtHR and appeal by cassation for reasons of jurisdiction against the judgments of special judges: the Constitutional Court places other fixed points.
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)122-133
Number of pages12
JournalGIURISPRUDENZA COSTITUZIONALE
Volume2018
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • giudizio di legittimità costituzionale
  • sentenze Corte EDU

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Questions of constitutional legitimacy due to conflict with the judgments of the ECtHR and appeal by cassation for reasons of jurisdiction against the judgments of special judges: the Constitutional Court places other fixed points.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint

Cite this