Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

(Quasi) una postilla conclusive (non) scientifica

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] (Almost) a (non) scientific conclusive note
  • Giuseppe Scaratti

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution summarizes the elements of evidence and operational splits in support of the basic hypothesis that making a good evaluation represents a condition / opportunity to improve the organization as well. Thanks to the structural connection between evaluative dimensions and organizational aspects involved, evaluation in general and the evaluation of training, in particular, seem to emerge as particular objects, peculiar to talk about organization. The themes are those of organizational learning, of the connected adult education in contexts of operational experience and of the institutional, organizational and practical implications that determine the conditions of effectiveness and positive impact.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] (Almost) a (non) scientific conclusive note
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationPratiche di valutazione formativa
EditorsArborea V., Cinque,M. Scaratti G.
Pages145-159
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • cultura valutativa, valutazione pertinente, uso e usabilità delle conoscenze valutative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] (Almost) a (non) scientific conclusive note'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this