Abstract
Objective A prospective multicenter randomized trial was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of postoperative protein-sparing therapy.Summary Background Data The metabolic effect of postoperative protein-sparing therapy has been shown by several studies, but the clinical utility of this treatment has not been investigated by large prospective trials.Methods Six hundred seventy-eight patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either protein-sparing therapy after surgery (protein-sparing therapy group) or conventional therapy (control group). The patients were monitored for postoperative complications and mortality.Results The rate of major postoperative complications was similar in both groups (protein-sparing therapy group, 19.5%; control group, 20.9%; p = 0.66) as were the overall postoperative mortality rates (4.7% and 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.43).Conclusions The present study indicates that routine protein-sparing therapy for patients normonourished or mildly malnourished undergoing major abdominal surgery is not clinically justified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 357-362 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Annals of Surgery |
| Volume | 223 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1996 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Keywords
- Protein-sparing therapy after major abdominal surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Protein-sparing therapy after major abdominal surgery: lack of clinical effects. Protein-Sparing Therapy Study Group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver