Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022

Ugo Boggi, Greta Donisi, Niccolò Napoli, Stefano Partelli, Alessandro Esposito, Giovanni Ferrari, Giovanni Butturini, Luca Morelli, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Massimo Viola, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Roberto Troisi, Marco Vivarelli, Elio Jovine, Alessandro Ferrero, Umberto Bracale, Sergio Alfieri, Riccardo Casadei, Giorgio Ercolani, Luca MoraldiCarlo Molino, Raffaele Dalla Valle, Giuseppe Ettorre, Riccardo Memeo, Giacomo Zanus, Andrea Belli, Salvatore Gruttadauria, Alberto Brolese, Andrea Coratti, Gianluca Garulli, Renato Romagnoli, Marco Massani, Felice Borghi, Giulio Belli, Roberto Coppola, Massimo Falconi, Roberto Salvia, Alessandro Zerbi, Emanuele F. Kauffmann, Giovanni Capretti, Luana Genova, Pastena Matteo, Michele Mazzola, Alessandro Giardino, Matteo Palmieri, Alberto Manzoni, Vittoria Barbieri, Roberto Ballarin, Gianluca Rompianesi, Roberta Rossi, Laura Mastrangelo, Serena Langella, Mariangela Ilardi, Roberta Menghi, Claudio Ricci, Andrea Gardini, Donata Campra, Enrico Crolla, Sara Cecconi, Roberto L. Meniconi, Valentina Ferraro, Marco Brizzolari, Francesco Izzo, Davide Cintorino, Stefano Marcucci, Giuseppe Giuliani, Luigi Veneroni, Francesco Moro, Cristina Nistri, Damiano Caputo, Baiocchi Gianluca, Vincenzo Mazzaferro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This retrospective analysis of the prospective IGOMIPS registry reports on 1191 minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPR) performed in Italy between 2019 and 2022, including 668 distal pancreatectomies (DP) (55.7%), 435 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) (36.3%), 44 total pancreatectomies (3.7%), 36 tumor enucleations (3.0%), and 8 central pancreatectomies (0.7%). Spleen-preserving DP was performed in 109 patients (16.3%). Overall incidence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo & GE; 3) was 17.6% with a 90-day mortality of 1.9%. This registry analysis provided some important information. First, robotic assistance was preferred for all MIPR but DP with splenectomy. Second, robotic assistance reduced conversion to open surgery and blood loss in comparison to laparoscopy. Robotic PD was also associated with lower incidence of severe postoperative complications and a trend toward lower mortality. Fourth, the annual cut-off of & GE; 20 MIPR and & GE; 20 MIPD improved selected outcome measures. Fifth, most MIPR were performed by a single surgeon. Sixth, only two-thirds of the centers performed spleen-preserving DP. Seventh, DP with splenectomy was associated with higher conversion rate when compared to spleen-preserving DP. Eighth, the use of pancreatojejunostomy was the prevalent reconstruction in PD. Ninth, final histology was similar for MIPR performed at high- and low-volume centers, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy was used more frequently at high-volume centers. Finally, this registry analysis raises important concerns about the reliability of R1 assessment underscoring the importance of standardized pathology of pancreatic specimens. In conclusion, MIPR can be safely implemented on a national scale. Further analyses are required to understand nuances of implementation of MIPR in Italy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1456
Number of pages18
JournalUpdates in Surgery
Volume75
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • minimally invasive pancreatic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective minimally invasive pancreatic resections from the IGOMIPS registry: a snapshot of daily practice in Italy on 1191 between 2019 and 2022'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this