Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Angela Santoro, Antonio Travaglino, Frediano Inzani, Patrizia Straccia, Damiano Arciuolo, Michele Valente, Nicoletta D’Alessandris, Giulia Scaglione, Giuseppe Angelico, Alessia Piermattei, Federica Cianfrini, Antonio Raffone, Gian Franco Zannoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: chemotherapy response score (CRS) is widely used to assess the response of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) to chemotherapy and is based on pathological examination of omental specimens. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of CRS assessed on the uterine adnexa. Methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching three electronic databases from 2015 inception to September 2021. We included all studies reporting either hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) or primary PFS data, for both adnexal and omental CRS in HGSC. HRs with 95% CI were extracted and pooled by using a significant p-value < 0.05. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by using Higgins' I2. Results: six studies with 691 HGSC patients were included. Adnexal CRS3 vs. CRS1-2 significantly stratified PFS, with a HR of 0.572 (0.447-0.733; p < 0.001). Omental CRS3 vs. CRS1-2 significantly stratified PFS with a similar HR (HR = 0.542; 95% CI 0.444-0.662; p < 0.001). Statistical heterogeneity was 0% in both analyses. Conclusions: adnexal CRS significantly stratifies PFS in HGSC and might be used when omental CRS is not assessable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-639
Number of pages7
JournalDiagnostics
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • CRS
  • chemotherapy
  • high grade serous carcinoma
  • ovarian cancer
  • prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Value of Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) Assessed on the Adnexa in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this