Presunzione sui prelevamenti bancari: La Corte Costituzionale scioglie ulteriori nodi interpretativi

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Presumption on bank withdrawals: The Constitutional Court resolves further interpretative knots

Serafino Sandro Masoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The presumption on bank withdrawals is constitutionally legitimate, since it is always possible for the taxpayer, even in the case of analytical-inductive assessment, to object to the percentage incidence of costs and provide evidence to the contrary, even by way of simple presumption. The presumptive mechanism is also reasonable since it coincides with the id quod plerumque accidit and is to be considered valid also with regard to entrepreneurs in a simplified accounting regime, who are not assimilated to professionals and self-employed workers.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Presumption on bank withdrawals: The Constitutional Court resolves further interpretative knots
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)24-63
Number of pages40
JournalRIVISTA DI DIRITTO FINANZIARIO E SCIENZA DELLE FINANZE
VolumeLXXXIII
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Accertamento delle imposte sui redditi
  • Presunzione sui prelevamenti bancari
  • Accertamento analitico-induttivo
  • Legittimità costituzionale
  • Prova contraria
  • Ragionevolezza
  • Incidenza percentuale dei costi

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Presumption on bank withdrawals: The Constitutional Court resolves further interpretative knots'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this