Abstract
Events, national and international news, and political and educational
writings often draw attention to instances of “prejudiced thinking” in
the digital environment, especially in Web 2.0, which can be thought
of as an “augmented reality”, a space not in contrast with reality but
certainly with its own unique characteristics. The usual response to this is to declare a state of emergency and continuous alarm (the Web has been “destroyed” by racism).
While this may be excessive we can nevertheless see a “polycentric proliferation” of racist
ideas, the social acceptance of which is facilitated by the absence of refined argument and
serious consideration. This report proposes a classification of “on-line racism”, based on a
qualitative-textual analysis obtained using T-Lab software, produced as part of the author’s
degree thesis (discussed in March 2016). To identify targeted educational responses and
effective methods of intervention, we need to analyse the various forms of on-line prejudice
in the light not only of rational considerations but emotional and relational aspects too.
The results obtained are interpreted in the light of a dual bibliography: on the one hand
that dealing with intercultural teaching and classical studies of racism, and on the other
that focusing on the characteristics of the digital environment, online communication
practices and media education.
The work also refers to conversations – with various results – with adolescent contacts on
the Ask.fm social network, selected because they had, in one way or another, participated
in racist conversations. These conversations serve as an experiment in promoting reflection
as well as a study in virtual ethnography.
It can be seen that the simplification of racist ideas and the lack of personal responsibility
deriving from “being on the internet” lead to an implicit reinforcement of the biological
foundations for racism, and its paradoxical acceptance and internalisation despite the lack
of sense and scientific evidence. On the other hand, we also see positive actions by the
web’s “digital citizens”. Using this “anti-racist capital” as a starting point, we emphasise
the importance of public education – intercultural, digital and moral – in developing
principled citizens and actors in the mediapolis, in affirming responsibility towards others
and in translating this into coherent Web 2.0 actions.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Prejudice 2.0. Forms of intolerance in contemporary youth culture. Theoretical models and educational practices. Prejudice 2.0. Forms of intolerance in contemporary youth culture. Theoretical models and educational practices |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Title of host publication | Building Bridges - L'Educazione Interculturale all'Epoca dei Nuovi Fondamentalismi. Ricerche, sperimentazioni didattiche, progetti educativi. Intercultural Education in the Age of Resurgent Fundamentalism. Research, learning activities, educational projects |
| Pages | 69-70 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | Quarta Giornata Interculturale Bicocca. Fourth Bicocca Intercultural Day Conference - Milano Bicocca. Dipartimento di Scienze Umane per la Formazione "Riccardo Massa" Duration: 26 May 2016 → 26 May 2016 |
Conference
| Conference | Quarta Giornata Interculturale Bicocca. Fourth Bicocca Intercultural Day Conference |
|---|---|
| City | Milano Bicocca. Dipartimento di Scienze Umane per la Formazione "Riccardo Massa" |
| Period | 26/5/16 → 26/5/16 |
Keywords
- Moral Education
- Web 2.0
- cittadinanza digitale
- digital citizenship
- educazione morale
- racism
- razzismi
- reduction of prejudice
- riduzione del pregiudizi
- web 2.0
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Prejudice 2.0. Forms of intolerance in contemporary youth culture. Theoretical models and educational practices. Prejudice 2.0. Forms of intolerance in contemporary youth culture. Theoretical models and educational practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver