Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Available scientific literature about open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) does not show univocal results in terms of postoperative pulmonary function. A meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the postoperative pulmonary function after OC and LC focusing on the Tiffenau index.
METHODS:
Electronic databases were consulted (Cochrane Library, Embase and Pubmed). Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI was calculated for the Tiffenau Index. The kappa test was performed to evaluate agreement between the reviewers regarding the quality of the selected studies. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the robustness of our study. Heterogeneity among studies was tested by using a chi(2) test at 0.05 significance level. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS:
Meta-analysis of the 13 articles included, resulted in a SMD of 53% (95% CI 0.04, 1.02) for the Tiffenau Index in favor of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The chi(2) test analysis showed the presence of heterogeneity among studies (Tiffenau index chi(2) = 99.97, p = 0.03). The sensitivity analysis confirms the validity of our results.
CONCLUSIONS:
Postoperative pulmonary function is better preserved after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than open cholecystectomy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Digestive Surgery |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Tiffenau Index
- cholecystectomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Postoperative pulmonary function in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of the Tiffenau index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver