Abstract
The recent attempts to remove from Italian law the ban of the contingency fee agreement between client and lawyer, culminated, after a few years, with the return to the previously abolished prohibition. This prompted a brief reflection on the reasons and scope of the ban in question, under the particular perspective of legal history, in order to better clarify what are the actual interests involved and what the possible solutions.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] «Per fas et nefas». Brief historical-legal considerations on the lite quota pact |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Italian Review of Legal History |
| Volume | 2017 |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- Contingency fee agreement
- History
- Patto di quota lite
- Storia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] «Per fas et nefas». Brief historical-legal considerations on the lite quota pact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver