Abstract
This paper focuses on the essence of forgiveness, understood as a waiver of revenge and the interest in a future no longer stigmatized by evil for those who committed it, and points out a notion of this concept that concerns the basic profiles of a criminal policy that is not pervaded by the logic of punitive demagogyand instead is compliant with the constitutional principles. Far from being a behavioural criterion that is merely based on religious principles or implies inaction against crimes, any reference to forgiveness requires to move away from the static nature of Retributive Justice and to open up to a project-oriented and inspirational vision of prevention so that the criteria for “doing justice” take on theopposite connotations as compared to those underlying the offence.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Penalty and forgiveness |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 1137-1152 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO E PROCEDURA PENALE |
| Volume | LXII |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- nozione di giustizia
- politica criminale
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Penalty and forgiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver