Paul Samuelson and Piero Sraffa – Two Prodigious Minds at the Opposite Poles

Luigi Lodovico Pasinetti

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter compares two giants, in the history of economic thought, who stood at opposite poles. Paul Samuelson was one of the main architects – perhaps the main architect, and in any case the leading symbol – of what nowadays is known as Neoclassical economics – i.e. mainstream economics. Piero Sraffa was the most acute critical mind of Marginal, hence Neoclassical, economics and the leading promoter of a resumption of that Classical economic analysis, which – born on the eve of the Industrial Revolution – was (as he claims) “nipped in the bud”, and unduly submerged by the over-flowing of Marginal economic theory.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSamuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century
EditorsMichael Szenberg, Lall Ramrattan, Aron Gottesman
Pages146-164
Number of pages19
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • Neoclassical vs Classical economic theory
  • Paul Samuelson
  • Piero Sraffa
  • Re-switching of techniques debate
  • Standard commodity debate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paul Samuelson and Piero Sraffa – Two Prodigious Minds at the Opposite Poles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this