TY - JOUR
T1 - Patterns of Restenosis After Left Main Bifurcation Single- or Dual-Stenting: An EBC MAIN Trial Subanalysis
AU - Maznyczka, Annette
AU - Arunothayaraj, Sandeep
AU - Banning, Adrian P
AU - Schmitz, Thomas
AU - Wlodarczak, Adrian
AU - Silvestri, Marc
AU - Egred, Mohaned
AU - Koning, René
AU - Spence, Mark S
AU - Morice, Marie-Claude
AU - Lefevre, Thierry
AU - Ferenc, Miroslaw
AU - Cockburn, James
AU - Erglis, Andrejs
AU - Brunel, Philippe
AU - Burzotta, Francesco
AU - Kretov, Evgeny
AU - Hovasse, Thomas
AU - Pan, Manuel
AU - Clesham, Gerald
AU - Chieff, Alaide
AU - Mylotte, Darren
AU - Lindsay, Mitchell
AU - Christiansen, Evald H
AU - Bouisset, Frédéric
AU - Vaquerizo, Beatriz
AU - Lassen, Jens Flensted
AU - Darremont, Olivier
AU - Louvard, Yves
AU - Stankovic, Goran
AU - Hildick-Smith, David
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: In the randomized EBC MAIN trial (European Bifurcation Club Left Main Coronary Stent), target lesion revascularization at 3 years poststenting of left main (LM) bifurcations was more frequent with upfront dual-stenting compared with the stepwise provisional approach. Restenosis location and its relation to stent technique are poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate restenosis location after LM bifurcation stenting, and the impact of stent implantation technique. Methods: Patients from the EBC MAIN trial who underwent target lesion revascularization during the 3-year follow-up had restenosis location assessed by the core laboratory. Restenosis was defined as ≥50% lesion diameter stenosis. Results: Among 48 patients with target lesion revascularization (mean age 70.3±10.6 years, 72.9% male), 31 were randomized to and treated with upfront dual-stenting, while 17 were randomized to the stepwise provisional technique, of whom 4 had dual-stent implantation. The treatment groups therefore comprised 35 dual-stented and 13 single-stented patients. The commonest pattern of subsequent restenosis was isolated ostial circumflex restenosis (58% of patients), regardless of dual- or single-stent implantation. The ostial circumflex was the culprit lesion for target lesion revascularization in 34 (71%) patients overall (dual- versus single-stented patients: 77% versus 54%; P=0.115). During the 3-year follow-up, the mean % diameter stenosis at the circumflex ostium was similar after dual- versus single-stent implantation (64.6% versus 60.5%, coefficient, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.46 to 0.22]; P=0.473). Single stenting from LM to the circumflex artery was associated with worse subsequent mean % diameter stenosis in the ostium of the left anterior descending artery versus single stenting from LM- left anterior descending (49.8% versus 19.8%, coefficient, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.003-1.13]; P=0.049). Conclusions: The circumflex ostium is the commonest site requiring revascularization after LM bifurcation stenting, irrespective of whether 1 or 2 stents were deployed. Strategies are needed to improve the long-term success of percutaneous coronary intervention to the circumflex artery ostium. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02497014.
AB - Background: In the randomized EBC MAIN trial (European Bifurcation Club Left Main Coronary Stent), target lesion revascularization at 3 years poststenting of left main (LM) bifurcations was more frequent with upfront dual-stenting compared with the stepwise provisional approach. Restenosis location and its relation to stent technique are poorly characterized. The aim of this study was to investigate restenosis location after LM bifurcation stenting, and the impact of stent implantation technique. Methods: Patients from the EBC MAIN trial who underwent target lesion revascularization during the 3-year follow-up had restenosis location assessed by the core laboratory. Restenosis was defined as ≥50% lesion diameter stenosis. Results: Among 48 patients with target lesion revascularization (mean age 70.3±10.6 years, 72.9% male), 31 were randomized to and treated with upfront dual-stenting, while 17 were randomized to the stepwise provisional technique, of whom 4 had dual-stent implantation. The treatment groups therefore comprised 35 dual-stented and 13 single-stented patients. The commonest pattern of subsequent restenosis was isolated ostial circumflex restenosis (58% of patients), regardless of dual- or single-stent implantation. The ostial circumflex was the culprit lesion for target lesion revascularization in 34 (71%) patients overall (dual- versus single-stented patients: 77% versus 54%; P=0.115). During the 3-year follow-up, the mean % diameter stenosis at the circumflex ostium was similar after dual- versus single-stent implantation (64.6% versus 60.5%, coefficient, -0.12 [95% CI, -0.46 to 0.22]; P=0.473). Single stenting from LM to the circumflex artery was associated with worse subsequent mean % diameter stenosis in the ostium of the left anterior descending artery versus single stenting from LM- left anterior descending (49.8% versus 19.8%, coefficient, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.003-1.13]; P=0.049). Conclusions: The circumflex ostium is the commonest site requiring revascularization after LM bifurcation stenting, irrespective of whether 1 or 2 stents were deployed. Strategies are needed to improve the long-term success of percutaneous coronary intervention to the circumflex artery ostium. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02497014.
KW - coronary vessels
KW - follow-up studies
KW - humans
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - stents
KW - coronary vessels
KW - follow-up studies
KW - humans
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - stents
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/322359
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015546
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015546
M3 - Article
SN - 1941-7640
SP - N/A-N/A
JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - Sept 17
ER -