Pagamento al creditore apparente ed al rappresentante apparente: un orientamento giurisprudenziale sempre ambiguo

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Payment to the apparent creditor and the apparent representative: an always ambiguous jurisprudential orientation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The article deals with the application of the art. 1189 italian civil code – according to the payment made by mistake and in good faith to an ostensible creditor discharges the debtor – also in the case of the payment to an ostensible representative (of the creditor). The study suggests that the italian judges only apparently are in favour of this large application of the rule; in fact they discharge the debtor only if the true creditor has negligently caused the debtor’s mistake. But, according to the Author, this solution is not always persuasive.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Payment to the apparent creditor and the apparent representative: an always ambiguous jurisprudential orientation
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)1356-1360
Number of pages5
JournalLA NUOVA GIURISPRUDENZA CIVILE COMMENTATA
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Falsus procurator
  • Pagamento al creditore apparente

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Payment to the apparent creditor and the apparent representative: an always ambiguous jurisprudential orientation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this