Pagamento al creditore apparente ed al rappresentante apparente: un orientamento giurisprudenziale sempre ambiguo

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Payment to the apparent creditor and the apparent representative: an always ambiguous jurisprudential orientation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] Overcoming the uncertainties of the past, the jurisprudence now seems to favor the application of the liberating payment rule to the apparent creditor in the hypothesis of solutio to the apparent representative, after ascertaining the "fault" of the true creditor in determining the error of the solvens. This operating rule is however much less favorable to the solvens in good faith than it appears at first sight and, adding an element extraneous to the case of art. 1189 cod. civ. to consider the payment liberating, it balances the opposing interests of the creditor and the debtor solvens in good faith in a not entirely convincing way.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Payment to the apparent creditor and the apparent representative: an always ambiguous jurisprudential orientation
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationI nuovi orientamenti della Cassazione civile
EditorsC. Granelli
Pages363-373
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Falsus procurator
  • Pagamento al creditore apparente

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Payment to the apparent creditor and the apparent representative: an always ambiguous jurisprudential orientation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this